Gunter Grass is a major player in Germany’s Vergangenheitsbewältigung (coming to terms with the past), a thorn in the side of the establishment, part of the establishment, winner of the Nobel Prize for literature, and a former Waffen SS member. Like most of his books, Crabwalk explores the impacts of the past on the present. the book is narrated by Paul Pokriefke, a journalist who is struggling to understand his relationships with his mother, his ex wife, and his son, who has committed a terrible crime. As with all of Grass’s book the root of all these problems lie in past events that have been repressed or ignored.
In 1936, a Nazi party functionary, Wilhelm Gustloff, was killed by a Jewish student in Switzerland. He becomes a ‘martyr’ for the Nazi party, and a ship in the Strength Through Joy fleet is named after him. Paul Pokriefke’s mother, Tulla, has happy memories of cruising the Baltic on the Wilhelm Gustloff, but her obsession with the ship has deeper and darker origins. In January 1945, when Danzig was surrounded by the Red Army, a heavily pregnant Tulla was one of over 10,000 refugees and soldiers who crammed aboard the ship to escape. The ship was torpedoed shortly after leaving shore, and over 9000 people died. Paul was born, or so his mother tells him, at the moment the ship sank, his first cries mingling with those of thousands of children drowning in the freezing sea.
As Paul grows up in East Germany, his mother tells this story over and over. The teenage Paul thinks he has escaped his origins when he moves to West Berlin not long before the borders are closed. But after German reunification in 1989, his mother is back, and so is the story. By this time he’s married, has a son Konrad, and has divorced. Konrad becomes Tulla’s audience for the telling and retelling of the sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff, and he becomes obsessed with it, setting up a website chronicling the full story and calling for recognition of the tragedy as a war crime.
On the site, Konrad debates with another young man, Wolfgang, who assumes the persona of the Jewish student who shot Wilhelm Gustloff. They agree to meet, in Schwerin, where Wilhelm Gustloff is buried. Wolfgang spits on the memorial. Konrad shoots and kills him.
During the trial, Paul Pokriefke struggles to understand how this happened. His ex-wife blames him for being an absent father. He blames his ex-wife for being too liberal. Tulla defends Konrad’s actions and blames West Germany for ignoring the suffering of its citizens during the war, especially those like her who were permanently displaced from what is now Poland. Paul, his ex-wife, and the dead boys parents meet in a bar after the verdict, collectively and awkwardly wondering how, when they thought they were doing everything right as parents, it seems they were doing everything wrong.
At the very end of the book, Paul visits his son in a juvenile detention centre several times. Konrad has been building a model of the Wilhelm Gustloff, supplied by his grandmother. On the last visit, he deliberately smashes it until his hand bleed, asking “are you happy now, dad?”. On returning home and switching on his computer, Paul comes across a neo-nazi website that exalts the ‘martyrdom’ of Konrad Pokriefke. It doesn’t end, he thinks, it never will.
The title Crabwalk is a reference to the process of moving forwards while appearing to move backwards or sideways. It echoes the way the characters need to scuttle back and forth across the wreckage of the past in order to understand the present disaster they find themselves in. The German title is Krebsgang, and Krebs is also the German word for cancer. I don’t know if that was a deliberate play on words by Grass, but it may well be a reference to the way that Germany’s continuing uneasy relationship with WWII and the divided years that followed, is eating away at the society from the inside.
Crabwalk is an enjoyable book. The characters all have their flaws – Konrad is self-righteous, Paul is a bit of a loser, Tulla is slightly nuts – but they are well drawn. Unlike Grass’s earlier books, which are very allegorical to the point of being slightly irritating, the metaphors and symbolism in this book are more subtle which allows the characters to shine through and be more like real people than are many in his earlier books. The only slight wrong note was Grass inserting himself into the narrative as an unnamed older figure that Paul occasionally seeks guidance from in his writing. I didn’t think this was needed.